Is your mission still accomplished, when my children are going to bed scared at night because they think there is going to be a World War?... History is a story, this is real lives here!!!!
-
-
-
You guys are so soft. You live in the most powerful country in the world. Read your kids a bedtime story
-
Wow. The most powerful country can do whatever they want? The world will be crazy!
-
All three countries united to accomplish this.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
you know, we the people all know that there was no way Assad would or ever has attacked his own people, you and i know it was the rebels and al-qaeda, now called the white helmets that did it and probably with the backing of the US then you drag my country into it (UK)
-
But Assad did, in 2012 during Obama’s presidency. Assad killed over 1400 civilians using sarin gas.
-
No he did not, if you look for the truth you will find it!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Funny how few know what really happened, and although I don’t support all of Trumps decisions I have to say he did the right thing. Yet, people criticize him for that, if he would have done nothing and Assad used his chemical weapons he would still get criticized for not acting.
-
The fact is that the people of Damascus in Syria have been hit hard.
-
I understand and wholeheartedly agree, but sitting back and watching how they get suffocated in sarin gas is not something I’m comfortable living with. I too wish we didn’t have to bomb any country, special those already in ruins but action had to be taken.
-
But what if the Syrian government isn't actually responsible for this act?
-
Assad is the government; Ba'athist Syrian Arab Republic (aka the government) led by President Bashar al-Assad, that’s why US, France and GB intervened when he used chemical weapons against his own people
-
So don't you really see a discord here? Retaliatory action for alleged still not proven "chemical weapons" through: - bombing of targets like chemical factories and storages, located near millions city - strike of 105! missiles, targeting 3 key sites: 35 per target! Really not?
-
are you sure is chemical weapons?
-
I? I'm sure one should let the experts do its work. And don't start the missiles before any evidence has been provided. And I'm sure you can't read: 1) I wrote it in quotes 2) I get a cognitive dissonance here alone? Strike to the chemical storages vs. usage of "chemical weapons"
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
-
Yeh, Jesus has stopped many wars hasnt he?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

ALWAYS BETTER FRIENDSHIP AND BUSINESS THAN WARs!