Donald J. TrumpVerified account

This is total fake news. You’re one slimy POS to say something like this.

Can you go a day w/o being triggered by trump?

Can your #FuckingMoron president go one day without being triggered by a news outlet that's NOT Fox? Can he go ONE day w/o being triggered by someone else who's successful?

Can the media go a day w/o reporting fake news on your president?

NOT my president. And I'll take ALL the media, SANS FOX. They ALL lie, and Fox doesn't? That's a good one.

Then you're not American if he's not your president !!

An American for 72 years and this awful person is not my President!!!

Right on, Maureen!!!!

Once again, false. The personal political beliefs of CNN's employees are of no interest to us. Their pursuit of the truth is our only concern. Also, Jeff's last name is spelled Z-U-C-K-E-R. Those are the facts. #FactsFirst

Dear Democrats: If you are worried about the $20 billion for the Wall, you should probably be worried about the hundred billion per year we spend on the illegals already here. The wall cost is trivial. maga

I would love you to site your sources on the figures you are throwing around.

"That amounts to a tax burden of approximately $8,075 per illegal alien family member and a total of $115,894,597,664." http://www.fairus.org/issue/publications-resources/fiscal-burden-illegal-immigration-united-states-taxpayers …

There are no stats on the demographics, No study questions, no information on where the numbers were pulled from and no sources listed in an index or bibliography. It is hard to take a study seriously when rhetoric like "alien apologists" is being used. It shows clear bias.

Simply because real terminologies hurt your feelings does not mean they do not have validity. Even if the numbers used are inflated by 500%, the wall would be slightly less costly than one year of taxpayer burden incurred by illegal immigration.

I never said they hurt my feelings, projecting much? I said it showed a clear bias. Studies are supposed to be objective and to not show bias. This study falls short in that regard. It is interesting that you are trying to make this about me when I was addressing the study.

We need a nickname for you Donald. How about Fat Bastard With Hair Like A Coconut Donald?

And just like that, as an avid reader of all things interesting, I will never buy one of your books. I might have, I am always looking for new topics, new schools of thought, differing takes on a subject. You have shown yourself to be closed minded and bitter. Not interested.

You weren’t going to buy one of her books. This tweet didn’t put you over the edge.

You are right, never heard of her. But if I had come across one of her tweets that wasn't rude and vile I would have. She is splitting her customer base in half.

Maybe she does. But it doesn't bother you that your president is splitting your country? I was under the impression that presidents of the United States try to mend the rifts created by an election campaign. I don't see that with trump.

We must not look in the same places. How is he splitting it? I align with his agenda for America so maybe I don't see what you see? I think he has been fair to all. I don't take anyone's word for his actions, I research and read til my eyes bleed. Lots of lies out there.

Well. Just look at how people calling each other "snowflakes" and "libtards". Republican, liberal and democrat are used as swearwords against each other, even though each of these words should represent the core pillars of your society. Do you think trump is trying to stop that?

Have you listened to any of his speeches? The whole speeches, not the MSM edited clips. State of the Union was outstanding. He has been trying, reaching across the aisle, offered DACA, other social solutions. No one reaches back. They are in 'hate' with him and won't try.