Why didn’t you ban bump-stocks and raise the age to purchase firearms to 21 when you said you would? Are you afraid of the @NRA?
....chief law enforcement officer, and they told me later, ‘oh by the way I’m not going to be able to participate in the most important case in the office, I would be frustrated too...and that’s how I read that - Senator Sessions, why didn’t you tell me before I picked you.....
-
-
-
Why would you want to ban bump stocks? When was the last time one was used in a mass shooting? And how many of the mass shooters were registered gun owners? Why raise the age to 21? Did you grow up around power lines?
-
You're joking right? Vegas
-
The implication there was the age limit of 21. Pretty sure the Vegas guy was a little older than that.
-
Personally even as a strong 2nd amendment supporter, a bump stock seems to be useless in home defense and even to defend against tyranny. There would be no harm in losing it and could possibly improve safety
-
That's not the point. You don't just create laws just to create laws. More law isn't the answer. Give an inch they take a mile.
-
The problem with this is that the entire purpose of our government is based on compromise. Yes current gun laws need to be enforced gasser better. But the issue with bump stocks is not the hill for conservatives to die on.
-
No, it's the hill on which you're willing to sacrifice hundreds of others.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Donald Trump’s partisan attacks on Robert Mueller are ludicrous. Mueller is a registered Republican, appointed by a Republican and was nominated by Republicans. He is widely respected on both sides of the aisle as being non-partisan. There would be no cause in any firing
-
Justice department investigated Benghazi for 4 years and zero indictments. Investigated Hillary Clinton’s emails for 2 years and zero indictments. In the first 14 months of the Mueller investigation there have been 23 indictments and 5 plea-deals
-
So Obama DOJ was a sham and couldn’t indict anyone
-
Or there wasn’t anything that could be indicted and the Republicans were on a witchhunt. That would be my guess.
-
Really. I don’t have to like or hate Donald trump to see the difference in treatment by the FBI and DOJ. It’s just obvious they wanted Hillary to win and will do anything to impeach trump
-
That’s laughable. They came out with the non-prosecuted email scandal a week before the elections. I want him prosecuted if he colluded with the Russians. I want him prosecuted for the things he has done to this country. He has made it ok to hate because of personal ignorance.
-
Last I heard collusion isnt a crime what is a crime is Hillary destroying her emails.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
FIRE
@jeffsessions FIRE@jeffsessions FIRE@jeffsessions FIRE@jeffsessions FIRE@jeffsessions FIRE@jeffsessions FIRE@jeffsessions FIRE@jeffsessions FIRE@jeffsessions FIRE@jeffsessions FIRE@jeffsessions FIRE@jeffsessions FIRE@jeffsessions FIRE@jeffsessions -
The AG Sessions hasn’t done one thing to show support for President Trump there’s no reason that he has to hide under his desk. The president has no AG Do you think Rosenstein is on his side? I don’t
-
Sessions appointed the IG Horowitz to look into the matter FBI/Hillary email server matter. Horowitz found criminal liability w/regard to FBI/Comey handling. IG report recommends criminal prosecution & Sessions must prosecute or resign. His last chance.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.