Mr. Hogg became a public figure through his own freely made choices. Criticism of a public figure, however illogical, is not harassment. It is protected speech. In fact, it's precisely the sort of speech that the founding fathers had in mind when they framed the 1st amendment.
No, I'm not "arguing as Breitbart would", I'm arguing as anybody who paid attention during a discussion of the constitution during middle school should be able to, without difficulty.
-
-
Assuming that it was a decent middle school, not to be mistaken with an activist-run indoctrination center. You really are without shame.
-
"but this is not about that" This is not about what? Your appeal was what it was. Now, having lost the argument on points, you're trying to leave the reader confused, while attempting something that really is defamation of character.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.