We've heard from a number of readers who questioned our recent article on Hope Hicks, President Trump's former aide, and the accompanying photo. NYT's @daniellerha has responded: (1/2)pic.twitter.com/Smk8QFcuF9
Show this thread
Here's the article. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/23/us/politics/hope-hicks-subpoena.html … As always, please feel free to add your thoughts here. We're listening. (2/2)
-
-
Hilarious. We should not have used this glamour shot but HERE IT IS AGAIN CLICK CLICK.
-
That's what I wanted to say! Are they mocking us?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Please address the since-altered misuse of the word "existential". Also, the factual critiques here: https://twitter.com/emptywheel/status/1132627140808249346 … Who edited the piece?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
get a goddamn public editor
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
#WrongAngle The Q is: Will she#ObeytheLaw? THAT’S the frame. Nowhere in the article is there ANY mention about how 45 directs his minions to BREAK THE LAW. The frame for this administration is the LAWLESS WH. The NYT ignores it.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.