This may b legal victory but can never b moral victory.Court case proved Oscar genuinely believed there was intruder.2 claim otherwise devalues what Reeva stood 4 n real impact of VAW.Oscar was sentenced as if he knew it was Reeva bringing entire SA justice system into disreputehttps://twitter.com/rdknowles2010/status/983700567955558400 …
He was sentenced for #murder. #OscarPistorius intended to blast and shred whomever was in his toilet, as he had the #watermelon. This was deemed murder, and 13 years was deemed a reasonable sentence.
-
-
Except that he believed he was shooting at an intruder who no doubt would have killed them both n in all probability raped R n tortured them both. The water melon was totally irrelevant it’s like claiming anyone who plays grand theft auto is going to kill people in RTA
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If it was reasonable then why have all other similar cases being treated so differently. Why was man who beat a toddler to death got a CH conviction n 10 yrs. is the life of an intruder more important than a child
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nel claimed that the life of an intruder was the same as Reevas life. He viewed Reeva the same as intruders who murdeeed a mother n drown her 12 yr old in boiling water that’s how much he thought of her yet no one complains
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do U really think a person who shoots dead an intruder in their home deserves a 16 yr sentence as that is effectively what Oscar got. In UK man who stabbed intruder not even charged yet crime rate in SA one of worst in world. U seem to care a lot about intruders though
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.