NEW: DHS used a private intelligence firm to monitor more than 600 family separation protestshttps://interc.pt/2IRKmpk
Näytä tämä ketju
By tracking Facebook accounts and disseminating the intelligence to law enforcement fusion centers, a paid "Threat Analyst" cataloged hundreds of family separation demonstrations at schools, churches and an "old Kmart parking lot" in Wisconsin.https://theintercept.com/2019/04/29/family-separation-protests-surveillance/ …
-
-
The concerning issue here seems to have less to do with how this company obtained this info (that seems pretty straightforward), and more to do with an opaque industry perceiving (correctly) that its law enforcement clients are interested in having it https://theintercept.com/2019/04/29/family-separation-protests-surveillance/ …pic.twitter.com/buNRMlwKP2
Näytä tämä ketju -
Smart thread from a knowledgable source on why protest intel funneled to DHS by private companies is troubling — even if it's "unsolicited"https://twitter.com/RachelBLevinson/status/1122911723885879296 …
Näytä tämä ketju
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
So they have the money and the time to catalog us as threats for exercising our rights to free speech and peaceful assembly but not the money or the time to keep track of which child belongs to which adult? Kirstjen Nielsen & co must never be accepted back into regular society.
-
Just show what pathological liars they are. I’ve gotta ask: Are these children being adopted?
-
The short answer is most likely yes but the cases are usually under seal so it’s difficult to track, especially since they’ve scattered the kids everywhere.https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna918261 …
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Give this some thought: Using facial-recognition software “your” government could easily build a database of participants in protests who could subsequently be targeted for future surveillance, harassment, or, eventually, identification as “subversives” This is Stasi-style stuff
-
It's inevitable. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Bin Laden won.
- 1 muu vastaus
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
When asked if he was concerned that people might stop using Facebook, Twitter and other social networks as a result of U.S. intelligence activities, Flynn answered matter-of-factly: “Yes.”
#DeleteFacebookhttps://www.defenseone.com/technology/2014/07/military-already-using-facebook-track-moods/87793/ … - 1 muu vastaus
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
> Are people organizing family-separation protests on FB anything like white supremacists spewing racial & religious hate on 4chan/8chan? No. > Are they both engaged in activity protected by 1A? Yes. > Do we want the government monitoring people engaged in 1A activities?
-
The hate groups yes. Not even hard to distinguish the difference when one of the two calls the number of people a group member kills their "score" and hopes they have a high one. Yes we should curtail terrorism and those that promote it.
-
Are you having a hard time judging whether antisemitism leads to murder? Let me help. It does. Problem solved.
-
Hate speech, any speech that threatens the safety of others, is not protected under 1A. Like shouting “FIRE!” In a crowded venue, when there is none.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Nazi Germany 2.0 reboot
-
With Zuckerberg filling the roles of both Himmler and Goebbels.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
We need another way to communicate. FB can’t be trusted.
-
Neither can Twitter.
-
I know.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Homeland Security + FaceBook = Stasi
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.