You literally just described SSR+hydration
Imagine shipping a tremendous amount of code to a complex critical system so that the result *feels* like something it's not? I wouldn't even do this to a devtool, why would you do this to an airplane? Even the official vocabulary is disturbing.pic.twitter.com/hqRxSd0ly9
-
-
-
You mean partial lazy hydration with individual roots ala web components and minimal JS?
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
This is literally what a non-breaking API update does.
-
Except this warranted the appropriate disclosures and retraining of a major breaking change
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
The default behavior of the plane, without constant software intervention, is to fall out of the sky. It is horrifying that it was ever built.
-
This is a mischaracterization. The 737 MAX development has been hugely problematic, but we don’t need to make things up…
- Još 7 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Should have been classified as a new type but yeah sure let’s patch it with software and sometimes during critical phases of flight actively deceive the pilots RE: condition of their aircraft what could go wrong
- Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I was just binging a great series by
@businesswars on this and the benefit of ‘fly by wire’ to minimise training between aircraft models. Great series, recommended!https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/business-wars/id1335814741?i=1000463134631 … -
Awesome, thanks for sharing.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.