Medijski sadržaj
- Tweetovi
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj, trenutna stranica.
-
Great opportunity to demonstrate team work with the closeline though. A couple that wrestles together stays together
pic.twitter.com/j1q7yBXGHm -
Poor things, just not enough hate to go around I guess.pic.twitter.com/wSs3KS4MIK
-
-
Emil Kirkegaard ladies and gentlemen. Bastion of moral worth (and pedophilia defender).
pic.twitter.com/lN4eVEsjqV
Prikaži ovu nit -
Saying the quiet part out loud. This guy has quite the track record of defending pedophilia, supporting eugenics and now saying clearly he thinks moral worth correlates with IQ.pic.twitter.com/r7Mo6eMkUc
Prikaži ovu nit -
Yet, instead of pausing to question the claims, it's more frequent to see Lynn used as the gold standard for IQ data by HBD types. His racist claims are repeated as facts that then are used to underly other claims.pic.twitter.com/eNLKb0z76f
-
Most don't put it at 60, but do think Lynn's estimate of 68 is accurate. Ben thinks 75 is the best. Lynn thought Africans educated at the best universities were only 85.pic.twitter.com/LuGP3to9Li
-
"I'm ignoring the race baiting" I really respect the ability to say that with no sense of irony.pic.twitter.com/lm5BjBHonP
-
The answer is perfectly presented here. It's a way to justify outcomes, regardless of the actual causes of those outcomes. It's an attempt to build bad policy directions on bad ideas built upon bad reasoning.pic.twitter.com/FifDdwNNVu
-
The thing about gifted programs in schools is that you grow up to realize that having a high IQ doesn't necessarily mean you'll do anything crazy. There are a lot of geniuses doing regular jobs. I think too much weight is placed on IQ.pic.twitter.com/XT8SA2QiT9
-
Look at what these "experts" considered among the most trustworthy news sources. It's HBD "creator" and "Pygmies should be considered a different species!" Steve Sailer. The survey is laughable, but you'll see it often on this topic.pic.twitter.com/aQvgdCAAMy
-
-
Like with Rosenberg's 2002/2005 papers, and the craniometry paper Bo cited, and even Reich's article in the NYT. It's obvious though a lot of people struggle understanding what's called race science.pic.twitter.com/E3nRdos0Fz
-
Note that black (and other) men can be given to corporations or used by the state and forced to work for symbolic wages at best. Read the 13th amendment and see it only outlawed certain forms of slavery, making specific exception for enslavement as punishment.pic.twitter.com/sGHJVWrnU9
-
You injected this into the conversation. I immediately dismissed it. You persisted. You've been fighting against that claim for a while now. A claim I had immediately rejected.pic.twitter.com/0h53DPC1XJ
-
You'll also notice his only criticisms of Trump seem to be as a tool to criticize his ideological enemies. He'll talk about how Trump is bad, but then say the way to get rid of him is to get rid of the anti-racists (I'm not giving him any more ground on his attempts to reframe)pic.twitter.com/oTlPC3ypY9
-
Given the areas mentioned, I can't see why this view would be contentious given that I've frequently seen the same criticism from academics in those very fields about others.pic.twitter.com/GxyLDgUbEw
-
"Evolution since humans left Africa" You seem confused about how the below statement is noticeably different from the above one.pic.twitter.com/t717cuaGG8
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.