Rant on modeling 1. There are a hundred gazillion models out there. Few of their owners have bothered to compare their model to others to see what is working and what isn't.
-
Show this thread
-
2. By the standards of the models I've worked with, they are all simple - a few differential equations, a curve fit. I've worked with a hundred or more elementary reactions and then a mass- and heat-transfer model that incorporated those in. (Hint: we had to boil them down to six
3 replies 8 retweets 74 likesShow this thread -
3. The only model I have seen that is at all transparent about its parameters is the Imperial College model. All the others I have seen are curve fits. They mumble about social distancing as a variable, but never say which parameter it fits into.
2 replies 29 retweets 137 likesShow this thread -
4. All the curve fits are with different functions. At least, back in the day when chemical kinetics was curve fitting, we always used the same function.
1 reply 11 retweets 75 likesShow this thread -
5. It looks like amateur hour. Everyone's got their pet model, but they're not telling us what it is. And a further layer of amateurs on Twitter say solemn words like "assumptions" that they have nothing to back up.
2 replies 15 retweets 103 likesShow this thread -
6. I've spent a lot of time on the Imperial College and IHME models. I don't intend to do that for every single model out there. https://nucleardiner.wordpress.com/2020/03/21/the-imperial-college-modeling-of-the-coronavirus/ …https://nucleardiner.wordpress.com/2020/04/07/the-ihme-epidemiological-model/ …
3 replies 33 retweets 134 likesShow this thread -
7. My assumption from here on in is that any model but the Imperial College model is crap until it's explained. With explicit connection of assumptions to parameters. And mansplaining this thread will get you blocked.
16 replies 26 retweets 258 likesShow this thread -
Tyler Cowen (and probably other economists who think they've got something to say) has never looked closely at the epidemiological models, judging from this. His questions are obnoxious. Ignore stuff like this.https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2020/04/what-does-this-economist-think-of-epidemiology.html …
8 replies 20 retweets 124 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @CherylRofer
What do you think of the modeling work done by Eva K Lee, which has now come to light in the "Red Dawn" emails? Not exactly a great example of transparency, but from my non-expert evaluation, better than much of the work.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/6879-2020-covid-19-red-dawn-rising/66f590d5cd41e11bea0f/optimized/full.pdf … for the raw document, though the NYT has good interpretation of it in their coverage. Fascinating reading.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.