Negative IgG doesn’t necessarily mean not infected though, does it?
Governement study about COVID-19 seroprevalence in Spain: among workers, those who had an "essential profession" and continued working were less infected than those staying at home. This should lead to a reflection on the role of general confinement. https://issuu.com/prisarevistas/docs/prevalencia/3 …pic.twitter.com/4pvoTGPiaz
-
-
-
IgG last 21 days in blood
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Weakened immunity from being inactive at home?
-
Lack of vitamin d perhaps
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Lets talk about France, what do you think about this one professor: https://www.ehesp.fr/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Impact-Confinement-EHESP-20200322v1-1.pdf …
-
It is just a numerical simulation. Virus is cought when several people are grouped inside a small room. Not outside (beach, park...) when you can collect free Vitamin D from the sun and get immunity. Staying inside was not good for patients. The worst advice ever
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Essential workers take precautions not to get infected. Instead, people staying at home thing they're are not vulnerable
-
More women, younger and with less chronical disease ... and more precautions.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.