Ronald A. Ortman

@raortman

The entire Universe is unstable. Deal with it.

Here
Vrijeme pridruživanja: srpanj 2009.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @raortman

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @raortman

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    7. ožu 2018.

    Mitt Romney, in 2016, making the case against Donald Trump in a speech at the Hinckley Institute of Politics at the University of Utah.

    Poništi
  2. prije 12 sati
    Poništi
  3. 1. velj

    That is too funny. Beautiful tweet to start the day.

    Poništi
  4. 24. sij
    Poništi
  5. 8. sij
    Poništi
  6. 17. pro 2019.

    Excellent thread. Worth every second of reading time.

    Poništi
  7. 17. pro 2019.

    The partisan differences in what voters heard. propaganda skewing the results? Source:

    Poništi
  8. 17. pro 2019.

    Extraordinary tweet. Gotta love Canada. With us, through thick and thin.

    Poništi
  9. 16. pro 2019.

    This is an excellent, insightful thread. Well worth reading. And retweeting.

    Poništi
  10. 14. pro 2019.
    Poništi
  11. 14. pro 2019.

    6/ Criminal allegations can come closer to the election, after SCOTUS decides 's document production cases. Much more evidence will be available at that point. Documents and testimony will be made public. And they will be damning. Patience is a virtue.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 14. pro 2019.

    5/ This may seem abstract. But it's not. Keeping criminal allegations out of the mix deprives of an opportunity to confuse the public with talking points about a higher burden of proof than that which is actually required.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 14. pro 2019.

    4/ doesn't get the benefit of the higher burden because he's not being deprived of 'life, liberty or property.' Impeachment is about him potentially losing his job. And that's all.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 14. pro 2019.

    3/ has discussed this issue, at length. And I think she's absolutely right. Impeachment is political, not criminal, and thus has a 'preponderance of the credible evidence' burden of proof. Far easier for to prove.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 14. pro 2019.

    2/ Avoiding criminal allegations allows to prove impeachable offenses by a 'preponderance of the credible evidence.' This is a far lower evidentiary burden than having to prove them 'beyond a reasonable doubt.' This makes perfect sense from a tactical perspective.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 14. pro 2019.

    1/ I don't see it that way. Impeachment is political. Not criminal. Staying away from criminal allegations (at this point) deprives the of an argument that should be entitled to the protection of a criminal burden of proof--i.e., beyond a reasonable doubt.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 13. pro 2019.
    Poništi
  18. 5. pro 2019.

    cc: : something to occupy your time while you're waiting for 's announcement on the status of the impeachment hearings. Feel free to watch it as many times as you want. It won't wear out.

    Poništi
  19. 4. pro 2019.
    Poništi
  20. 2. pro 2019.
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·