Andrey Chetverikov

@ralfer

PostDoc at and a co-supervisor at . Studying visual uncertainty in motion perception and probabilistic templates in visual search.

Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Vrijeme pridruživanja: listopad 2008.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @ralfer

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @ralfer

  1. prije 23 sata

    Ugh, it's one of these days when you understand that you still don't understand much and the real question is whether you moving anywhere at all. God damnit.

    Poništi
  2. 4. velj

    An advisor lures PhD student into a never-ending project

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. sij

    This is my favourite optical illusion of all time and I still don't fully understand how it works. Any takes? To experience it, open up the full image and stare blankly at the smudged colours for 30s. All the colour should slowly disappear leaving just the white background 🤯

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    3. velj

    The Confidence Database is now out in ! It has 145 datasets with data from over 8,700 participants and almost 4 million trials. THREAD

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. 3. velj

    One of the nicest and not so obvious things about is how you can reuse the plot with different data with %+% operator.

    Poništi
  7. 3. velj

    This is interesting. I wonder if it's gonna reach the same status as Cochrane has for medicine-related studies.

    Poništi
  8. 1. velj

    The comments to this tweet are just wonderful.

    Poništi
  9. 30. sij

    Everything you did (not) want to know about Dutch lunches

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    The biggest challenge of information-intensive ECR courses for relatively closed scientific communities like the one we run in Russia is striking the balance between something students know they need (technical skills) 1/3

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. 29. sij

    I was very busy this year, so kudos for organizing this should go mostly to Nika and Philipp . I hope this project will live long and prosper, although I have no idea how to find time for it between the work I'm paid for, collaborations, and my personal life.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. 29. sij

    I did a small tutorial on simulations & power analyses ( ), there was also stuff on open science, networking, career planning, debugging, online studies, etc. - a bit of everything, in short. Slides & content are here (in Russian).

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 29. sij

    Last weekend, we organized the third cognitive gradschool in St. Petersburg, Russia. It provides an intro to some advanced hard skills mixed with the talks and tutorials about academia. Importantly, the mug design (2020 on the right) has improved compared to the first school =)

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 29. sij

    I studied in Russia and I've seen the transition from the old-style evaluation based on how good you are at story-telling and who your friends are to a publication-based scheme happening within 10 years, and the latter looks more open and unbiased to me despite all the flaws 3/3

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 29. sij

    For example, has recently talked about putting more weight on the "narrative" in grant funding. But isn't the narrative is the thing that we wanted to get rid of in the first place? Story-telling is a skill that is not really related to knowledge accumulation. 2/3

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. 29. sij

    just finished listening to this episode, and I can't stop thinking about the parallels between and "anti-publication metrics" movement in academia. Sure, pub. metrics isn't the best way to evaluate scientists, but the problem is that the other metrics are worse. 1/3

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 25. sij
    Poništi
  18. 23. sij

    wow, a life-saver (although an autosave option with versioning history from team would be even better)

    Poništi
  19. 20. sij

    plus, as we've shown awhile ago, in real studies tiny precision differences do not matter, measurement noise on modern systems is negligible compared to the brain noise

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. 20. sij

    A very important milestone for the studies of timing in psych/neuro experiments. Should we now maybe close the discussion of online experiments (and also Psychtoolbox vs PsychoPy)?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·