The answer to this is super fascinating! I’ve spent many long nights spelunking this rabbit hole, as though preparing for this very tweet. Subvocalization, a thread:https://twitter.com/rubyyatess1/status/1067040980233330688 …
-
-
This is true for sign language users too! Instead of tongue and larynx activation, we see activation of the fingers and forearms. I suspect other muscles heavily implicated in signing, like those in the face, activate as well, but I can’t find any studies on it.
Show this thread -
(There really aren’t enough studies of sign language users in linguistics or cogsci. It took until the 60s for mainstream linguistics to accept what deaf folks long knew: ASL is a true language, with recursive grammar just as expressive as, but different from, spoken language.
Show this thread -
This is surely connected to ableist theories that deaf people aren’t as intelligent as hearing people, or that sign language users can’t do <X> thing that spoken language users can. Unsurprisingly, these theories have repeatedly been shown to be wrong.)
Show this thread -
Most of us learn to read by reading aloud or signing visibly. It seems this imprints a connection between text and speech acts that never goes away. You’ll often notice little kids narrating what they’re doing. Turns out, adults do too! We just learn to do it much less obviously.
Show this thread -
If this is happening all the time, you should be able to detect it, right? And even do speech recognition on it? Yep. Here’s some NASA work on subvocal speech recognition: https://www.nasa.gov/centers/ames/news/releases/2004/subvocal/subvocal.html …
Show this thread -
And Arnav Kapur at MIT has built a proof-of-concept silent computing platform, combining subvocal speech recognition via EMG with bone transduction, to create an “intelligence augmentation device.”http://news.mit.edu/2018/computer-system-transcribes-words-users-speak-silently-0404 …
Show this thread -
Subvocalization appears to be important to reading comprehension. Not recognizing individual words, but understanding the structure of sentences and making connections within the text. Some speed readers suppress (but can’t eliminate) subvocalization, but comprehension suffers.
Show this thread -
In fact, this is one of the pieces of evidence for subvocalization: if you force people to keep their tongues pressed to the roof of their mouth when they read, their comprehension suffers vs people who were made to do some other annoying thing that doesn’t interfere with subvoc.
Show this thread -
Which makes a lot of sense when you consider the relationship between language and movement. To move, your brain needs to plan a sequence of movements—it needs to compose a script. To comprehend the movement of others, your brain needs to derive their script from sensory data.
Show this thread -
Movement planning and comprehension force us to serialize our internal states into a sequence of efferents (action commands), and also, to reduce sequences of perceived efferents into internal states. This is exactly the kind of stream processing necessary for language.
Show this thread -
So, my suspicion? Movement is the root of all language. There’s a tendency to think of language as airy, cognitive, disconnected from our blood and bone. This suggests something different. It tells us that language comes from the body. Dancers are the first storytellers.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's like in singing where if you "think" a note, you can sing it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
