When monkeys make movements, both active and passive Area 2 population has one stirring facet To our great amusement, it separates the movements Which can't be explained by S1 models classic! (2/6)pic.twitter.com/p7ly7VmO8z
U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
When monkeys make movements, both active and passive Area 2 population has one stirring facet To our great amusement, it separates the movements Which can't be explained by S1 models classic! (2/6)pic.twitter.com/p7ly7VmO8z
So we found separation in S1 activity And thought it related to monkey passivity But when we arm-tracked The neural code cracked It seems like S1 has a whole-arm proclivity (3/6)pic.twitter.com/bjshm1aoiF
We wanted to test out this cool observation That S1 appears to have whole-arm sensation But one problem is, in the model analysis, Hand and whole-arm have a strong correlation (4/6)
We wanted the models to predict different features of neural activity as monkeys make reaches To decorrelate, we changed the workspace And we figured out which of these models were keepers (5/6)pic.twitter.com/XcpZpnH0ZS
A number of features had different predictions For example, let's look at the tuning directions Between workspaces they shifted, which whole-arm models predicted So it turns out area 2 has a whole-arm inflection! (6/6)pic.twitter.com/8XzhkRABZy
This is how I like to science! Great work.
Thanks! I'm glad you like it 
There once was a student of Lee’s Who finished his thesis with ease Then again it was terse Just two pages of verse “That’s allowed?” thought the other mentees
Yes! Time to invade #neurotwitter with limericks!
Nicely done!
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.