Its also what it is. Bribery/extortion. Agnew found out that it doesn’t work out very well.
NUGGET: The Dem decision 2 retire “quid pro quo” & embrace “bribery” followed a DCCC study showing the word resonates more in battlegrounds It’s also clearly stated in the Constitution as grounds 4 removing POTUS. Could we see it in impeachment articles?https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/pelosi-calls-trumps-actions-bribery-as-democrats-sharpen-case-for-impeachment/2019/11/14/0ee9a202-0702-11ea-b17d-8b867891d39d_story.html …
-
-
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This is interesting reporting. Kinda fascinating that all actions need to go thru focus groups but I’m glad they did this
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
? 100%.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Jfc this was not rocket science. Who was the drop of mold who started the quid pro crap? It was never smart or accurate
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s smart for Dems to use word bribery instead of quid pro quo.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They should have led with it. Quid pro quo was stuffy and unrelatable from the start, and quickly became irritating. We know what it was. Use plain language. Are dems finally figuring out what GOP has known forever...how to fight?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.