• Home
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • Verified account @
Suggested users
  • Verified account @
  • Verified account @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookie Use and Data Transfer outside the EU. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
rabois's profile
Keith Rabois
Keith Rabois
Keith Rabois
@rabois

Keith Rabois

@rabois

entrepreneur, investor, contrarian

Joined February 2009
  • © 2016 Twitter
  • About
  • Help
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • Verified account @
Suggested users
  • Verified account @
  • Verified account @

Retweet this to your followers?

Optional comment for Retweet
 
 

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • Verified account @
Suggested users
  • Verified account @
  • Verified account @
140

Are you sure you want to delete this Tweet?

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Add a location to your Tweets

    When you tweet with a location, Twitter stores that location. You can switch location on/off before each Tweet and always have the option to delete your location history. Learn more

    Profile summary

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Your Tweet will go to these people from the conversation:

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    Preview

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Buy Now

    Hmm... Something went wrong. Please try again.

    Previous Tweet Next Tweet
    1. jason ‏@Jason May 25

      @davewiner you are correct tech journalism is weak (@Theranos!!!), but that doesn't mean Gawker didn't cross the line outing people Right?

      0 retweets 5 likes
    2. Mathew Ingram ‏@mathewi May 25

      @Jason @davewiner: That's irrelevant to the most important aspect of this, which is the chilling effect on a free press

      0 retweets 6 likes
    3. Keith Rabois ‏@rabois May 25

      @mathewi is a simple don't post a sex video rule a chilling effect?

      0 retweets 8 likes
    4. Mathew Ingram ‏@mathewi May 25

      @rabois I'm not in favor of rules about which specific things news outlets are allowed to report on

      1 retweet 0 likes
    5. Keith Rabois ‏@rabois May 25

      @mathewi isn't common sense sufficient here?

      0 retweets 3 likes
    6. Mathew Ingram ‏@mathewi May 25

      @rabois So reporting on the details of the tape is somehow different from showing a fuzzy nine-second clip?

      0 retweets 0 likes
    7. Keith Rabois ‏@rabois May 25

      @mathewi absolutely.

      0 retweets 3 likes
    8. Mathew Ingram ‏@mathewi May 25

      @rabois How?

      0 retweets 0 likes
    9. Keith Rabois ‏@rabois May 25

      @mathewi utterly gratuitous w new news value whatsoever. I can't fathom any reasonable journalist publishing a sex video, perhaps if POTUS.

      0 retweets 3 likes
    10. Mathew Ingram ‏@mathewi May 25

      @rabois So you admit that in some cases it might be considered newsworthy then

      0 retweets 0 likes
      Keith Rabois ‏@rabois May 25

      @mathewi barely, perhaps if candidate for President or it one existed of Clinton/Monica but even then ??!

      12:24 PM - 25 May 2016
      0 retweets 0 likes
        1. Mathew Ingram ‏@mathewi May 25

          @rabois So now all we are debating is the specific news judgement in this case, which isn't something a court should rule on

          0 retweets 3 likes
        2. View other replies
        3. Keith Rabois ‏@rabois May 25

          @mathewi this was published 100% to appeal to prurient interest which has never been protected in any court or country.

          0 retweets 3 likes
        4. Mathew Ingram ‏@mathewi May 25

          @rabois I agree it's not the best example of speech that deserves to be protected, but that's the whole point of having the 1st Amend

          0 retweets 0 likes

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2016 Twitter
        • About
        • Help
        • Terms
        • Privacy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info