How could cutting healthy tissue off of a baby be anything but that?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Absolutely, because it mutilates male genitals. It's a barbaric cult ritual and nothing more. Any rational person can see that when they track its history.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, of course it is.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes yes and yes
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In the actual sense of the word, yes it is. Advocates of it say is not. Which is interesting because advocates of female circumcision don’t think it’s “mutilation” either. Proponents of an abusive, mutilating practice don’t *ever* think what they do is wrong. It is though.
#i2Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes it is mutilation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s a willful perversion of the natural healthy state of the penis. The procedure is excruciatingly painful & nerve endings are permanently harmed & lost. Mutilation is a perfect word for such a barbaric practice. Profiteering from the sale of the body part is also revolting.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Obviously and by definition. This is like asking 'Is liquid water a kind of beverage'?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.