It's like these people are permanently broken records. Doesn't matter how many times the courts tell them to get fucked sideways, they're wrong as shit about state law, they have a rock-solid misplaced faith in their intelligence.
-
-
No - "this dispute" is the one about "post-certification election legislaoring" or whatever, remember? Not about things that happened in the states. For crying out loud, if I can keep your stupid story straight, why the hell can't you?pic.twitter.com/TgEPEgvn1r
Show this thread -
-
If you have an issue with the Antrim error rate, take it up with the people who messed up the thing.
Show this thread -
On Wisconsin! Hopefully we can get through this without having to stop, and hopefully there's not much left after this except the Land-O-Sheriff-Joe.pic.twitter.com/lg85k5Mef5
Show this thread -
Apparently, having more drop boxes per square mile in the parts of Wisconsin where humans outnumber cows violates the Constitution. Who knew?
Show this thread -
Do you have to be nuts to drive a truck for USPS, or is that an optional extra?pic.twitter.com/5vbhWcMGU5
Show this thread -
Finally isn't the word to use on page 104 of 116. Trust me on this.pic.twitter.com/MIrggjHcz8
Show this thread -
-
-
Also: Of COURSE Maricopa gets more drop boxes and early voting centers. There are PEOPLE there. Cacti can't vote. Neither can rattlesnakes. You don't need a lot of drop boxes in the Grand Canyon or Petrified Forest or Meteor Crater. This isn't rocket surgery.pic.twitter.com/aT7BZ6vC5y
Show this thread -
And none of the errors you are complaining about are the errors that the rate given applies to you intergalactic dunderheads. One rate is for purely machine errors and you're talking about human mistakes you nimrods.pic.twitter.com/gfJW5fIuqY
Show this thread -
Good lord it's nearly 11 this is almost done and I'm going to have to at least look at the motion for preliminary injunction just to see if there is a LEGAL ARGUMENT for the whole made up post-election cert thingy.pic.twitter.com/CiAQEBStXr
Show this thread -
Also, I don't think "Article II" is a stand-alone cause of action. But what the hell, it's not like you really need one of those to complain when you get booted out of the courthouse at Mach 3 anyway.
Show this thread -
You know what, though - if the court tells them they can have post-election legislative certification for elections starting in 20020, I'm not sure I'd complain.pic.twitter.com/1xDDsudiMb
Show this thread -
And I know I've said this, but if it's a prerogative it's not mandatory.pic.twitter.com/hKaYZ5RWuG
Show this thread -
Lots more stuff here - all pure bullshit but also purely legal argument about the states being somehow preempted from determining the manner of selecting electors by the thing in the US Constitution that says they get to select the manner of selecting electors.pic.twitter.com/57cpzJ201P
Show this thread -
And there is simply no way that a federal court - any federal court - can enjoin the Legislative Branch from carrying out a mandatory duty set out in the Constitution.pic.twitter.com/UOh7BJb283
Show this thread -
WHAT THE EVERLOVING HOLY FUCK? NO DAMN STATE DOES THIS THING YOU HAVE MADE UP.pic.twitter.com/H4CTP4eOnb
Show this thread -
How can it possibly - possibly - conceivably - be an equal protection issue if every state is blowing off the totally made up constitutional obligation you have invented out of totally thin air? HOW?
Show this thread -
FFS, *only* making those states do that would potentially CREATE an equal protection problem. You dunderheads.
Show this thread -
AS THEY DO IN WHAT OTHER STATES? The state of Confusion? The state of Denial? The state of Delusion? The state of New You Definitely Smoking Something?pic.twitter.com/vftvah7J9Y
Show this thread -
WHAT OTHER CITIZENS OHMYGOD NOW YOURE JUST MAKING UP THAT THERE ARE PLACES THAT DO THIS THING YOU INVENTED WHAT FRESH HELL AM I IN NOW?pic.twitter.com/CjWk3W8lVn
Show this thread -
Lots more about "legislative post-election certification." Here's the Google results for that phrase. Two are this twitter thread; one is this complaint; and one is the brief that fuckhead lawyer submitted advocating for SCOTUS to take a case he said here was correctly declined.pic.twitter.com/EbMfV5z70H
Show this thread -
-
No. No. No. No. nononononono. You didn't just do that to me.
Show this thread -
-
Everything from page 34 to 109 was a factual allegation about the election. That's 75 pages. 75 damn pages of factual allegations THAT HAVE NOT ONE DAMN THING, NOT ONE BLOODY DAMN THING TO DO WITH THE CLAIMS. ZEFUCKINGRO. W H A T are they smoking? I need to know what to avoid.
Show this thread -
The clerk that has to read this is gonna lose their shit in technicolor. That's a certainty. Losing of all the shit in Imax with full THX sound is a very very real possibility. Just - WOW.
Show this thread -
75 totally irrelevant pages of meaningless factual allegations in a case brought on an emergency basis just before Christmas is -- I don't have words.
Show this thread -
OK.Let's see what they're requesting. Usually you put the more reasonable requests up front and the longshots toward the end, but I see they're starting by requesting that several thousand pages of long-settled statutes, federal and in all 50 states, be declared unconstitutional.pic.twitter.com/k96HUQJ3vR
Show this thread - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.