Cons: Canada is only 1% of global GHG, doing climate action here is pointless Libs: kk lets do some climate action in the other 99% of the world Cons: wtf shouldn’t we be doing climate action in Canada????
-
-
-
you mean those countries that have less of a carbon foot print than Canada does? So how exactly is that helping? Also the Canada isn't even hitting the targets it set for itself, so I don't know wouldnt the logical thing be to get our own house in order?
- Još 4 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I always wear a blazer in the forest, lol. Guess it’s better than the platform shoes she wore while fishing on slippery rocks.
-
Maybe it goes with her fishing heels?
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
yep, we have FN issues, healthcare issues, housing issues, job issues etc etc that all need funding, but yet here we are playing savior of the climate, while not meeting the liberal climate mandate here at home.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I don't think the carbon tax revenue is necessarily channeled into green initiatives. So the money they are giving to Latin America was money that could have gone for something useful ( transfer payments for hospitals or roads).
-
I thought that was the point of the carbon tax to curb habits and fund green tech? Why are we funding green in other countries where their carbon foot print is vastly smaller than our own.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
There’s no Climate Crisis, there’s a Liberal Crisis!
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
It was never about Canada, only sending our money to other nations to make Trudeau look good.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.