X could be "exponentially worsening", though.
AND BY THE WAY, "exponentially" describes a rate of change. X can't be "exponentially worse" than Y any more than it can be "quickly worse"
-
-
-
I will overlook for now the fact that "exponentially" is also not a drop-in substitute for "quickly", "rapidly", "significantly" or "much"
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nope!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“It’s E=mc^2, not E=mc2”, Tom said exponentially.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I somehow accept it as “multiple-orders-of-magnitude worse”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Untyped mathematics, not even once. There is a random variable that takes the value of 4 with probability 1, this is not the same as 4.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
learn to speak in derivatives, differentials . A Can bei Exponential to B.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
O(2^n) is exponentially worse than O(n), and that doesn't describe a rate of change.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.