They called the second Angular "Angular"
-
Apparently, calling the second Angular "Angular" was considered to be less confusing than the alternative
Look at this amazing rationale. "We can't retroactively change all instances of 'Angular' to 'Angular 1'... How about 'AngularJS'?"pic.twitter.com/O2QCYcJHLu
-
-
Cache invalidation and NAMING THINGS
-
Apparently it needs to be explicitly stated: in the JavaScript ecosystem, the suffix "JS" will be considered optional. Node.js is "Node"
- 14 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
how about Circular? after all, they're not even almost compatible.
-
Someone suggested "Tubular"
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I love the notion that the maintenance burden I will suffer when using Angular will be mostly about branding.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.