Easter may be humanity's chronologically earliest coding horror
-
-
Replying to @qntm
The more I research the Easter calculations, the more I get the sense not of necessary complexity but of deliberate obfuscation
4 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @qntm
Easter calculations boil down to converting Gregorian calendar dates to a liturgical lunar calendar which appears to have no formal name (?)
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @qntm
Getting concrete information about this lunar calendar is surprisingly troublesome, and all the explanations I can find are very bad
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @qntm
For example, documentation seemingly goes to inordinate lengths to conceal the fact that this lunar calendar ignores leap days
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @qntm
Much is made of the lunar calendar's fine attempt to approximate 365.2425-day Gregorian years. It doesn't do this! It uses 365-day years
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @qntm
Just subtracting all the leap days out of the Gregorian calendar makes converting to the lunar calendar unimaginably simpler
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @qntm
Then there are epacts. Epacts require big, horrible, impermanent tables both to compute and to interpret. They are also absolutely unneeded
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @qntm
The epact of any given year is the "age of the moon [i.e. day of the lunar month] on 1 January". But sometimes it's 30 when it should be 29
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @qntm
The epact goes up by 11 every year, mod 30. But not always! It also doesn't tell you WHICH lunar month it is
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
Basically the epact is a highly complex derived property from a relatively simpler underlying lunar calendar
-
-
Replying to @qntm
And understanding epacts just makes the underlying structure of the Metonic cycle seem unapproachable
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @qntm
Now here's the thing. I'm not a historian, so this is second-hand, but from what I understand this IS deliberate obfuscation by the Church
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes - 17 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.