...but if there *is* a schema for legal names, organisations can be held accountable when they fail to handle them correctly 
-
-
Replying to @qntm
"You can't handle people named 'Null'. This violates EU law. Fix system or you may no longer sell flights here. You have 28 days."
3 replies 4 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @qntm
Must names be expressible in any kind of binary encoding? Must they be textual? Is pictorial/spoken acceptable? What about sign names?
3 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @qntm
Just getting started on answering this question probably necessitates an organisation as large and complex as the Unicode Consortium
2 replies 2 retweets 6 likes -
-
Replying to @qntm
Plus, we treat constraints as challenges. No matter what schema you choose, it will always be possible to invent a name outside of it
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @qntm
The moment it's declared that names can be at most 1000 characters long, someone gives their kid a 1001-char name. In protest! And why not!
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @qntm
I don't know. The most concrete statement I can make is that the situation could be better than it is
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @qntm
If someone named O'Connor can't book a flight, though, I'd rather be able to start legal machinery than just comiserate
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.