(x) nobody is about to renumber every event in history
-
-
Replying to @qntm
(x) the history of calendar reform is insanely complicated and no amount of further calendar reform can make it simpler
2 replies 3 retweets 6 likes -
-
Replying to @qntm
I don't normally go point by point but this particular proposal is right out of the textbook. http://qntm.org/calendar
2 replies 5 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @qntm
The only thing I don't think I've seen before is dodging the "thirteenth month name" issue by removing month names entirely.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @qntm
Oh, actually, placing "New Year's Day" at the END of the calendar year is a new one on me.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @qntm
On leap years, does Leap Day come before or after New Year's Day? Which year is it part of?
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @qntm
Honestly, I don't have a serious problem with alternate calendars as long as they're well-specified and conversions are easy
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @qntm
Just because the Gregorian calendar is unkillable doesn't mean it can't be improved upon.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @qntm
A perfect calendar is impossible, but the Gregorian calendar falls a LONG way short of the best we could do.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
But even in the ideal case, the total amount of potential improvement is far too small to justify the switch.
-
-
Replying to @qntm
We choose among imperfect systems, and the best we can do is the imperfect system whose imperfections we fully understand
2 replies 6 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @qntm
A calendar too similar to the Gregorian calendar will be ambiguous. A calendar too radically different will be unpalatable.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.