Why on Earth does C++ have two separate data types for sets and "unordered sets"
-
-
Replying to @hobbified
@hobbified You don't understand. In all other universes, sets are unordered by definition1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hobbified
@qntm (we're dealing with a finite collection of things represented as a finite number of bits, so an order must exist)3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @hobbified
@hobbified The data types should be called "ordered_set" and "set" respectively depending on whether I care about the storage/return order
7:49 AM - 16 Apr 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.