Trick question, a televised urgent plea for COBOL developers could be any year between 1959 and 9999https://twitter.com/zarawesome/status/1246518788759134210 …
Show this thread
-
Show this thread
That troubling possibility that leaving your system to run unattended for years at a time, and placing an urgent public call for COBOL developers only when it breaks, may be more cost-effective than keeping a COBOL developer on staff or migrating to something modern
-
-
Six weeks later the emergency COBOL developer has saved your bacon and gone back into retirement. Thus solving the problem once and for all
Show this thread -
To be clear, I don't want to disparage COBOL. I know barely anything about it as a language. It being old is not a problem. The problem is the diminishing number of available programmers
Show this thread -
C is pushing fifty and nobody complains about that Haha just kidding I am 100% here to disparage C, garbage programming language
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I can't receive a verification email
-
No website for which I am responsible has an email verification system
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
cost-effective or not it's how everything else in the planet is managed as well
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's definitely better, because you should never, ever rewrite your code, according to Joel Spolsky, who is omniscient.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.