this, the Quine atom 𝑥 = {𝑥} from non-well-founded set theory, is retroactively me https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quine_atom
Show this thread
astonishing, not only is "qntm" "Quine atom" without vowels, "Quine atom" is in fact "qntm" plus ONE OF EVERY VOWEL
-
-
…thus causing the paradox that "Quine atom" both does and does not include a "y", which is why they're not in standard set theory. (…or should that be "Quiney atom"?)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.