and it 100% guaranteed fits in a tweet so reply with your guesses
Show this thread
there is a smallest integer which has never been named or seen by any human or machine
-
-
-
it's a little ridiculous that this is legitimately the best guess so farhttps://twitter.com/JernikKross/status/1217845645572177921 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I mean, your tweet just named it
-
if so, you'd have no problem supplying me with that number's digits
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Is -inf an integer for you ? (that's why you didn't ask about a floating point number, right ? As IEEE754 mandates the existence of such numbers...)
-
even if it is an integer I have no clue how you could think it would pass the rest of the definition
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
10, but i'm not telling you which base; that would invalidate it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I tried to type it but the machine didnt see it before so it put this instead
-
thanks for trying
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.