As I understand it, legally speaking, two events are never considered to be simultaneous, which is really interesting to me while also resolving a vast slew of potential legal edge cases
-
-
So I guess what you'd do is pick the *current monarch*'s frame of reference as authoritative?
Show this thread -
So it doesn't matter if, in your frame of reference, Charles died first. In Elizabeth's frame of reference, Charles was her successor in her forward light cone and that's what counts
Show this thread -
This leads to a scenario where, in a relativistically colonial fashion, Charles was only ever monarch over a tract of spacetime which he was unable to ever visit or actively rule, due to being spacelike-separated from it
Show this thread -
Ah, it looks like succession doesn't work in the way I described, William ends up monarch no matter what
Show this thread -
Okay, instead imagine a new scenario where William is *being born* right at the same instant that Charles dies, so the question is how the line of succession gets juggled
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If the legal system derives its authority from The Queen, then the legal reference frame should travel with the Queen. Otherwise, keep the ruler in the reference frame.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Would you have to consult earth? Couldn’t you just have a Trusted Earth Clock aboard that was always compensating for relativistic effects as you travel?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think you just have to accept that. Even without relativity if QE is on a cruise with William and resigned, you'd need to know if Charles was still alive and non-catholic to know if he or William succeeded.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.