"The field definition does *not* include division. This means we are free to define division however we want" is one of the stupider things I've read todayhttps://www.hillelwayne.com/post/divide-by-zero/ …
Show this thread
-
Am I doing something unsound? Absolutely not. It is *totally fine* to define 6 - 1 to be 309
Show this thread
Alright you got me, defining the result of 1/0 to be 0 is a sight better than it being undefined behaviour. Score one for the Pony programming language over C
-
-
2027. Compilers become sentient, replace calls to random number generators with exactly 0 to engineer undefined behaviour and minimize run time
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.