"The field definition does *not* include division. This means we are free to define division however we want" is one of the stupider things I've read todayhttps://www.hillelwayne.com/post/divide-by-zero/ …
-
-
Am I doing something unsound? Absolutely not. It is *totally fine* to define 6 - 1 to be 309
Show this thread -
Alright you got me, defining the result of 1/0 to be 0 is a sight better than it being undefined behaviour. Score one for the Pony programming language over C
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.