Tweetovi
- Tweetovi, trenutna stranica.
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj
Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @qnikst
Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @qnikst
-
А раз нечем похвастаться самому, можно хоть похвастаться успехами детяpic.twitter.com/enwj4wWAe0
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Semi-correct way to write exceptions handlers. (Please do not try what we do on this show at home.)pic.twitter.com/AXPW9ezYMO
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
This year
#fby_conf was very nice: nice talks, good organization. Had a great time there, thanks to everyone involved.Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
The main take away from this talk is that “I’m not counted” :/
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
ФП трек: Julia Не ФП трек: scala Кажется, что я что-то не понимаю в ФП
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Maybe fancy Haskell is needed at least to keep the mind in the active state; once you do a boring stuff for a long time you can catch highway effect and fall "asleep" during walking hours. As a result make a terrible mistakes, that you'd never do if your mind was active...
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
So if put all above in the table, where good is all maintability properties and simple/advanced is language feature set: | Good | Bad | Simple | Advanced 1A | + | - | +/- | +/- 2A | - | + | +/- | +/- 1B |+/-|+/-| + | - 2B |+/-|+/-| - | +
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
The problem appears when people start tossing definitions around, e.g. use 1A with 2B (even they are not exclusive then) or tell that 1B => 1A. People do change the axioms they use and definitions even in the middle of the discussion and that is quite disappointing. 6/6
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
I don’t have any problem with either (1A+2A) or (1B+2B). With A: good code necessary boring Haskell (by def) boring Haskell not necessary uses simple features With B: Boring Haskell doesn’t mean good code Good code is not necessary boring or fancy 5/6
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Another approach is to define “Simple Haskell” without details (1B): A Haskell subset that uses only easy to grasp features of the language. In this case fancy Haskell (the opposite) (2B): Way to code that uses advanced Haskell features 4/6
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
With this definition “fancy Haskell” (The opposite) becomes (2A): Way to code that leads to unnecessary complicated, unmaintainable or untestable code. 3/6
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
One way to define “simple Haskell” (1A): Simple Haskell is an approach to programming on Haskell that leads to maintainable, testable and extensible problems that a newcomer can easily join. 2/6
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Let me add a bit more fuel into “simple/boring Haskell“ trend. It seems that one of the problem for (non-)acceptance and debates is vague definition. 1/6
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Чем заняться в воскресенье первокласснику, если не хочется на улицу? Итого сириус.курсы : factorio - 1 : 0. (На принятие решения влияние не оказывалось)
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Alexander Vershilov proslijedio/la je Tweet
Еще рабочие места для хаскеллистов! Набегайте: https://typeable.io/job/haskell-developer.html … и RT конечно же
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Alexander Vershilov proslijedio/la je Tweet
Why is it ‘Data.Functor’, but ‘Control.Monad‘? Linear types help us to understand in “A tale of two functors, or how I stopped worrying and love Data and Control”https://www.tweag.io/posts/2020-01-16-data-vs-control.html …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Just curious what helps you better understanding of the theorem, solution, idea? (Please check academia in a case if you work there or think that it’s heavily influenced you)
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
I wanted to play with Haskell, but my friend told that there is very strict boring checker, that is hard to deal with. Is it true or did he want to fool me?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Alexander Vershilov proslijedio/la je Tweet
The amount of human genetic data doubles every 7 months. How do scientists keep track?
@Eric_Fauman and@tweagio's data team worked on a solution: a search engine called the "Table of Everything". Check out his article!https://twitter.com/Eric_Fauman/status/1215336187008815110 …Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
*Just curious*, how many additional contributors GHC had after switching away from the Phabricator. I remember a lot of people who told that Phab was the reason they do not contribute?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.