They have justified the killing by saying he was a terrorist, which results from the IRGC designation. Probably gets around the IUMF and such.
-
-
-
But the FTO designation relates to sanctions and prosecutions, not targeting. Unless I’m completely misreading this is missing something big
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
sounds like OLC said this strengthens the argument for legality under 2002 AUMF?
-
cf the "Lernaean Hydra" filings in the John Doe case
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I haven't read the article so I don't know the context, but is it possible the source meant that it opened the aperture in a political sense, rather than in a legal sense?
-
I suppose? I’m really bewildered
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Ask
@IvankaTrump about the IRGCHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
The admin's approach seems to be that, b/c Art II is everything & the WPR is (depending on the day) aspirational, unconstitutional, or pirate code, the Exec Branch just has to use a formalized process to document its own AUMF-equivalent "Official Stamp of Art II Self-Defense."
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Link?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I can't tell if this is incompetence or a bad faith argument on their part. I'm not sure which is worse.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.