We thinking the "other agency" is the CIA?
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
"Trump is NOT NOT a Russian asset"
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I am so confused. If he had said not currently a source or a former source would it have been fine?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
This is what I'm confused about. What if he was trying to clarify? That he actually was not a source? I get it wasn't proper but also maybe not as malicious as it sounds?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I want to see a (ok, redacted) copy of the original vs. "doctored" emails. I cannot tell from just the description whether this was actually "doctoring" or bad bottom-posting (http://www.idallen.com/topposting.html ).
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
If Carter Page agreed to be recorded is he technically a source or a tool to receive information? CIA used him as a tool to record? CIA relied on what he was telling them post meetings? Small difference, but not sure if legally there is a difference.
-
Was wondering something similar...if he was a “source” bc CIA was making him tell them when he talked to Russians because he’d gotten caught in shady stuff, is that the same as a “source” who is on the up-and-up and a trusted contributor to national security?
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
