Pwn All The Things

@pwnallthethings

🦊🦊

The sky, mostly
Vrijeme pridruživanja: prosinac 2013.

Medijski sadržaj

  1. 29. sij

    But it doesn't even stop there. The information gets squeezed even further to end up in the final tweet, dropping even the qualifier that this is anything at all to do with elections

    Prikaži ovu nit
  2. 29. sij

    The headline compresses this even further: it's now turned into a generalized criminal penalty for spreading "voting disinformation" online. I get it, headlines have to be catchy and compressed. But lots of nuance has been lost to get us even this far.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  3. 29. sij

    That gets buried a little bit in the article, four paragraphs in, just after a discussion about tech companies needing to be more accountable. The compression here drops the qualifier that this is about *specific* facts about how and when to vote.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  4. 29. sij

    The original press release is pretty clear on the scope of this law: it will have penalties for knowingly disseminating false information about how and when to vote in order to suppress turnout (+link)

    Prikaži ovu nit
  5. 9. sij

    I am filing for bankruptcy on all the abuses of the power

  6. 3. sij

    But, wait, it gets worse. Apple defines "good faith" as not only turning over all *your* research on their platform and also requiring that *your customers* turn over *theirs*, but they also reserve the right to just not ever pay for it if you do.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  7. 3. sij

    Notice how Apple defines "good-faith" research here. That for Corellium to be a "good-faith" org, it would have to *require* its users to turn over any security research directly to Apple. Otherwise it's not "good faith".

    Prikaži ovu nit
  8. 3. sij

    The DMCA claim is a direct broadside against jailbreaks (unrelated to the other copyright claim), and worse, it's DMCA based on a theory of second-order harm: "C could be used to develop jailbreaks that could, in turn, be used to circumvent copyright, therefore C violates DMCA"

    Prikaži ovu nit
  9. 3. sij

    The first is that Apple's lawsuit explicitly calls out jailbreaking as something Apple thinks is or should be unlawful. Like, it's not subtle. It's directly there.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  10. Writing the malware to break into e-corp like

    Prikaži ovu nit
  11. #3: But because he was in these conditions that was an "obvious risk" and which the law is clear is unlawful for months on end, because it was only six days, the law isn't clear and that "dooms his case".

    Prikaži ovu nit
  12. #2: we've previously held that keeping someone in these conditions for "months on end" clearly breaks the law

    Prikaži ovu nit
  13. #1: 5th Cir: risk to his health was "especially obvious here"

    Prikaži ovu nit
  14. I mean, read the judgement. It literally says the opposite. Explicitly says that MI5 does not have, and does not claim to have, power to confer any civil or criminal immunity to its officers or informants.

    Prikaži ovu nit
  15. Parliament "legally prohibiting" Parliament from doing something is like the UK legal version of "could God create a sandwich so big even he couldn't eat it"

  16. Ah, no, they explain the redaction difference here; it's the difference between the Dec 11 and Dec 9 versions; they lifted certain redactions "in response to subsequent decisions made by the Department of Justice and the FBI about the classification of the underlying information"

    Prikaži ovu nit
  17. This is what it looks like on the Oversight<dot>gov version

    Prikaži ovu nit
  18. The DOJ attorney who got fired and referred for prosecution for doctoring an email? This was what the email was about, and that's a very material change

  19. And what does Steele say about Source E?

    Prikaži ovu nit
  20. This paragraph right here. What. Are. You. Doing?

    Prikaži ovu nit

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·