Medijski sadržaj
- Tweetovi
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj, trenutna stranica.
-
But it doesn't even stop there. The information gets squeezed even further to end up in the final tweet, dropping even the qualifier that this is anything at all to do with electionspic.twitter.com/cJLioBpwDO
Prikaži ovu nit -
The headline compresses this even further: it's now turned into a generalized criminal penalty for spreading "voting disinformation" online. I get it, headlines have to be catchy and compressed. But lots of nuance has been lost to get us even this far.pic.twitter.com/egzzAi9R5l
Prikaži ovu nit -
That gets buried a little bit in the article, four paragraphs in, just after a discussion about tech companies needing to be more accountable. The compression here drops the qualifier that this is about *specific* facts about how and when to vote.pic.twitter.com/CuEcAz133M
Prikaži ovu nit -
The original press release is pretty clear on the scope of this law: it will have penalties for knowingly disseminating false information about how and when to vote in order to suppress turnout (+link) https://elizabethwarren.com/plans/fighting-digital-disinformation?source=soc-WB-ew-tw-rollout-20200129 …pic.twitter.com/4XcFzezvdN
Prikaži ovu nit -
I am filing for bankruptcy on all the abuses of the powerpic.twitter.com/cmONewGnns
-
But, wait, it gets worse. Apple defines "good faith" as not only turning over all *your* research on their platform and also requiring that *your customers* turn over *theirs*, but they also reserve the right to just not ever pay for it if you do.pic.twitter.com/EeKAaGKWNT
Prikaži ovu nit -
Notice how Apple defines "good-faith" research here. That for Corellium to be a "good-faith" org, it would have to *require* its users to turn over any security research directly to Apple. Otherwise it's not "good faith".pic.twitter.com/jXmswCD0Ly
Prikaži ovu nit -
The DMCA claim is a direct broadside against jailbreaks (unrelated to the other copyright claim), and worse, it's DMCA based on a theory of second-order harm: "C could be used to develop jailbreaks that could, in turn, be used to circumvent copyright, therefore C violates DMCA"pic.twitter.com/EalkXpmTqY
Prikaži ovu nit -
The first is that Apple's lawsuit explicitly calls out jailbreaking as something Apple thinks is or should be unlawful. Like, it's not subtle. It's directly there.pic.twitter.com/lN4JfYW2O8
Prikaži ovu nit -
-
#3: But because he was in these conditions that was an "obvious risk" and which the law is clear is unlawful for months on end, because it was only six days, the law isn't clear and that "dooms his case".pic.twitter.com/8S53o8AYh9
Prikaži ovu nit -
#2: we've previously held that keeping someone in these conditions for "months on end" clearly breaks the lawpic.twitter.com/n2Oi6z7W9s
Prikaži ovu nit -
#1: 5th Cir: risk to his health was "especially obvious here"pic.twitter.com/mZBYMSj7HL
Prikaži ovu nit -
I mean, read the judgement. It literally says the opposite. Explicitly says that MI5 does not have, and does not claim to have, power to confer any civil or criminal immunity to its officers or informants.pic.twitter.com/tCJ5UeOJMo
Prikaži ovu nit -
Parliament "legally prohibiting" Parliament from doing something is like the UK legal version of "could God create a sandwich so big even he couldn't eat it" https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1206693158924496898 …pic.twitter.com/mK2UnrybxD
-
Ah, no, they explain the redaction difference here; it's the difference between the Dec 11 and Dec 9 versions; they lifted certain redactions "in response to subsequent decisions made by the Department of Justice and the FBI about the classification of the underlying information"pic.twitter.com/iaOFSlqsaR
Prikaži ovu nit -
This is what it looks like on the Oversight<dot>gov versionpic.twitter.com/OVmzKSGYMf
Prikaži ovu nit -
The DOJ attorney who got fired and referred for prosecution for doctoring an email? This was what the email was about, and that's a very material changepic.twitter.com/wliaEZVkKi
-
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
