Code, money, guns, and encryption are all becoming speech. The first amendment is the last word on freedom.
-
-
@naval-কে উত্তর দিচ্ছেন
We’ve entered an era of labeling political weapons “speech” because it’s protected, as opposed to protecting speech because it’s an effective as a political weapon. This is not likely to be good for freedom.
২ replies ০ টি পুনঃটুইট ১৫টি পছন্দ -
Ex: the Supreme Court recently used FoS as a rationale for striking down a CA consumer disclosure law because they wanted anti-abortion groups to be able to mislead patients. The state didn’t want to stop their speech, just require patients be given data. Crazy precedent.
৩ replies ০ টি পুনঃটুইট ৭টি পছন্দ -
Not crazy. *Freedom* of speech prohibits not only the government preventing speech, but compelling it as well. If a law were passed that required everyone to say, "Have a nice day" to everyone they met, with a fine or prison for violation, how free would that be?
১ reply ১ টি পুনঃটুইট ১৫টি পছন্দ -
@DeLossMcKnight @naval-কে উত্তর দিচ্ছেন
The government compels speech all the time. The nutrition facts on your food. The disclosures when you sell a house. The public filings after you IPO. Free speech has never been absolute in America, despite what narrative-revisionists with an agenda would have you believe.
১ reply ০ টি পুনঃটুইট ৩টি পছন্দ
With most moral or legal principles, there are tradoffs and balancing concerns is required. Unfortunately, many find nuance hard to handle, and they become useful pawns in games smarter people are playing against one another.
লোড হতে বেশ কিছুক্ষণ সময় নিচ্ছে।
টুইটার তার ক্ষমতার বাইরে চলে গেছে বা কোনো সাময়িক সমস্যার সম্মুখীন হয়েছে আবার চেষ্টা করুন বা আরও তথ্যের জন্য টুইটারের স্থিতি দেখুন।