Brazilian slavery withered away largely because of the prohibition of the slave trade after strong British pressure in 1850 and the Free Womb Law in 1871: politics were essential to the abolition. Didn’t get your point here...
-
-
Replying to @ThiagoKrause2 @pseudoerasmus and
The productivity of Brazilian slaves was high (even less than the productivity of American slaves). This, in fact, explains the owners' resistance to ending slavery 1/2
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Lucas_CR91 @ThiagoKrause2 and
It is a well-known fact that in the second half of the nineteenth century the price of slaves fell, but rents remained high. This shows that the farmers anticipated the end of slavery, but that the slave remained productive 2/2
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Lucas_CR91 @ThiagoKrause2 and
I just meant slavery in Brazil did not go out with a bang, like in the USA. But now that you mention it, Thiago: the abolition of the int'l slave trade did not undermine slavery in the USA, so why did it in Brazil?
3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @pseudoerasmus @Lucas_CR91 and
I say because Brazilian slave agriculture was not as productive as US slave agriculture, and slave labour was less efficiently allocated in Brazil than in the USA. The expansion of US cotton was a supply-side phenomenon (productivity growth), but the Brazilian sugar expansion+
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @pseudoerasmus @Lucas_CR91 and
+in the 19th century was a demand-side phenomenon (it got a demand boost from the abolition of slavery in British West Indies + the Haitian Revolution)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @ThiagoKrause2 @Lucas_CR91 and
before the big coffee expansion you had the reinvigouration of the sugar industry thanks to the end of slavery in the West Indies.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @pseudoerasmus @Lucas_CR91 and
So it was not in the nineteenth-century: 1780-1820 and then late in the century again.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThiagoKrause2 @Lucas_CR91 and
well even in 1840-50 Brazil was a more important producer of sugar than in 1790. I'm saying this was only possible because of the relative decline of the Caribbean sugar. Then you had the industrial beet sugar against which Brazilian sugar was less competitive
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
you see much more in Brazil than USA: increasing importance of free black & coloured labour in the same industries using slave labour. The fact that free labour was more likely substituted for slave in Brazil is a function of the low productivity of Brazilian slave agriculture
-
-
Replying to @pseudoerasmus @Lucas_CR91 and
Will get back to you. Driving to take students to the museum, see you all later.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
No current events in this feed
Econ history ≠ hist of econ thought.

b. MCMLXXII