I believe that UBI is an important concept and that Yang has broken ground by introducing it to the conversation. But an extra $12k/year is nothing compared to the savings Americans would get if we didn’t have premiums, copays, or medical debts. Really it’s not even close.
-
-
it's because of the VAT that he plans to use to fund it, it's basically a 10% regressive tax - it's wealth distribution not redistribution, the money is already there if he would just sprinkle a little class war in there....
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
The rationale that it’s a response to the inevitable unemployment crisis resulting from automation hides the cold reality that it will provide cover for small government billionaires like Yang to decimate social services. It’s a replacement for them, not a complement to them
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.