It took me giving my own talk today to realise it (!) but I can abstract over the runtime impl' (currently using only Future.sequence, http://future.map & future.get.get) with just a couple of standard typeclasses. It could then represent general typelevel DAGs of things...
-
-
Replying to @propensive
Is this a very complicated way to say "Monad+Traverse", Jon?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @larsr_h
It is, but with and additional "conditionally-safe" `get`.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @propensive
I should probably look at your slides, because I don't yet get that (no pun intended).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @larsr_h
I'm not sure how much the slides will help, but they're probably your best shot... ;)
9:35 AM - 15 Dec 2017
from Islington, London
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.