It took me giving my own talk today to realise it (!) but I can abstract over the runtime impl' (currently using only Future.sequence, http://future.map & future.get.get) with just a couple of standard typeclasses. It could then represent general typelevel DAGs of things...
-
Is this a very complicated way to say "Monad+Traverse", Jon?
-
-
I should probably look at your slides, because I don't yet get that (no pun intended).
-
I'm not sure how much the slides will help, but they're probably your best shot... ;)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.