@propensive for some reason this dummy implicit annoys me, is there some other convention I'm missing? https://gist.github.com/er1c/6b55baf1bf1e064d3e9118d20fe79c4f …
An alternative might be to implement the method once, taking an implicit typeclass instance which actually provides the implementation.
-
-
The problem is that one version has repeated arguments, and the other doesn't, so the API would have some...redundancy.
-
Oh my, overload, what will we do :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.