I was told last night that type `A with B` != `B with A` even though each subtypes t'other. I'm not convinced. Can anyone explain it to me?
-
-
By what aspect of *type* theory breaks if we assume `A with B` == `B with A`? I might be asking the wrong question, here...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive @fommil
If only I could search scala-internals for <:< or =:= ........
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You could narrow it down by filtering on
@contrarivariant...1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
apparently there are 650 topics by Paul in scale-internals..
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dwijnand @propensive and
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/scala-language/vH_g2aAM62Q/iYqs_ARHgOsJ … (via https://groups.google.com/d/topic/scala-internals/qAICKMOa_f0 …) keywords: isSubType type-equivalence symmetrypic.twitter.com/oumpLUzyeD
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Thanks for the digging!
4:28 AM - 4 Apr 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.