Though this exemplifies that if you spot a typo in Scalac, *you* can quite easily be the one to fix it!https://twitter.com/propensive/status/844199187763945472 …
-
any idea why scalac, if there are < 4 bugs, say 2, prints “two errors”, while > 4, say, 15, it prints “15 errors”?
It always did - I noticed this years ago... But I guess it was just Martin's personal preference!
-
-
Writers/journalists usually do the same, but they normally use 10 or 20 as the cut-off points.
-
we are programmers, how is somebody supposed to parse such craziness
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.