You want a `Future[T]`. Some people will give you a `Future[T]`. But some just want to give you a `T`. What do you do?pic.twitter.com/2saVb926zE
-
I'm behind you on that. But I think we'll be in the minority. Also SAM types introduce another way to break source compatibility
SAM Is available in 2.11 behind a flag, so I'm hopeful of being able to drop 2.10 support and adopt it soon.
-
-
You're right. But my point was accidental source compatibility breakage, like give Futurize a util method in v1.1. Boom.
-
Aha, right. Don't do that! But that's a good point I hadn't even considered...
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.