@jamie_allen why do you think more people will be familiar with addCurrenttToAccumulatedValues than reduce? We can't even spell it =D
-
-
Replying to @li_haoyi
@li_haoyi@jamie_allen I think the difficult thing is writing code that's accessible to programmers of a variety of different levels.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @propensive
@li_haoyi@jamie_allen But I don't like the idea of reducing our code to an arbitrarily-chosen lowest common denominator featureset.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @propensive
@li_haoyi@jamie_allen More advanced programmers have a responsibility to educate too, and they can do that by example.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @propensive
@li_haoyi@jamie_allen If avoiding reduce((a, c) => a + c) isn't worth the syntactic burden, then reduce(_ + _) is worth learning/teaching.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive
@li_haoyi@jamie_allen But should it be that familiar answer: "we need better tooling"? IDEs with "language learning mode" could help here.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive
@propensive@li_haoyi@jamie_allen Racket has had *useful* language levels for many years. We missed an opportunity with SIP-18 I think.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@tpolecat @li_haoyi @jamie_allen Are those technical constraints, or just consensus/policies?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.