.@milessabin I just found a neater way of doing ill-typed checking which doesn't involve putting the code into a string.
-
-
Replying to @propensive
@propensive@milessabin link a gist and take my money !1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @propensive1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @propensive
@propensive@milessabin thanks ! Now give me an hour or two 'til I understand that witchery : )1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ValentinKasas
@ValentinKasas@milessabin Actually, I spoke too soon. That will come up with loads of false positives. :(2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive
@ValentinKasas@milessabin Those implicits will take precedence over implicits we *do* want to invoke. Hold onto your money for now. ;)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive
@propensive@milessabin I was about to ask how you guaranty that the "last" implicit conversion involved ends up in deferTypeError1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ValentinKasas
@propensive@milessabin anyway, that's a interesting lead (as far as I'm able to judge, which is not that far)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@ValentinKasas @milessabin Thanks. Starting to think the problem is fixable, though not sure I'll have time to go having macros today...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.