.@milessabin I just found a neater way of doing ill-typed checking which doesn't involve putting the code into a string.
-
@ValentinKasas@milessabin Actually, I spoke too soon. That will come up with loads of false positives. :(
@ValentinKasas @milessabin Those implicits will take precedence over implicits we *do* want to invoke. Hold onto your money for now. ;)
-
-
@propensive@milessabin I was about to ask how you guaranty that the "last" implicit conversion involved ends up in deferTypeError -
@propensive@milessabin anyway, that's a interesting lead (as far as I'm able to judge, which is not that far) - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.