You know that thing where you go to bed unable to solve a problem, and you wake up with the answer? It's a lie. My implicits still diverge.
-
-
@extempore2 So maybe forevermore divergent implicit expansions is the only answer, and my destiny.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive
@extempore2 Any idea whether it's possible to infer the existence of an implicit Foo[A with B] iff I've got a Foo[A] and a Foo[B]?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive
@propensive@extempore2 that looks like more of a nightmare than a dream no? ;-)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aloiscochard
@aloiscochard@extempore2 Would it? I think it would be fantastic! Even worth succumbing to a macro for...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @propensive
@propensive@extempore2 what if A and B have both a member with the same signature, no common interface but a different implementation?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@aloiscochard @extempore2 A and B are phantom types in my use case, and Foo is my own.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.