@propensive give it another night
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@extempore2 So maybe forevermore divergent implicit expansions is the only answer, and my destiny. -
@extempore2 Any idea whether it's possible to infer the existence of an implicit Foo[A with B] iff I've got a Foo[A] and a Foo[B]? - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@extempore2 There was also an implicit "without macros" in there too...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@extempore2 And frequently an ambiguous implicit two somethings.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@extempore2@aloiscochard Hey, let me run my circus! -
@propensive@extempore2 also, beware of man that take bear costume and make it look like it's a bear dancing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFFn1hu6azg …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@extempore2@propensive@aloiscochard /prod prodThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@propensive Divergent, even under Euclidian geometry,Euclid would not be pleased. Still,they must meet up somewhere in the universe then… :sThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.